3 Feed reader users should be able to subscribe to the blog
7 As of this writing, the blog is served as HTML which is appropriate for
8 web browsers but maybe not for other mechanisms like feed readers.
10 Feed readers have different formats that they support:
11 * h-feed is a microformat built into the page
12 * rss and atom are XML based publishing formats
13 * JSON feed is a JSON based publishing format
14 * rss 3.0 is a text based pblishing format :P
16 Currently the blog contains a single generator function that copies
17 assets and generates HTML out of markdown files. This is good enough for
18 the current setup, but if it were to generate more it would get messy
21 Given the constraints listed below, some formats are not recommended:
22 * RSS 3.0 is not a good candidate at the moment as it would require
23 us to parse the markdown to extract the title.
24 * Atom would work, however, given the requirement for an id, title, and
25 date this would require more effort than a more lenient format.
26 * RSS 2.0 fits the constraints as we wouldn't need to specify anything
28 * JSON Feed would work, however given the requirement for an id, thtis
29 would require more effort than a more lenient format.
31 It is unclear whether the current constraints are good enough for feed
32 readers. If this causes issues, it's likely we will have to include date,
33 id or title as required in the other formats.
35 After reviewing the functionality of existing readers, it has been found
36 that an id and publication date would be needed for readers to behave
37 correctly. This means that ATOM and JSON Feed would be equally valid
38 as solutions than RSS 2.0
40 The current generator function depends on knowing a source for the post
41 being generated, and a target on where the assets will be placed.
45 Given we serve the blog in a feed reader friendly format, users will be able to subscribe.
49 Given I add the blog to a feed reader service like Reeder or Feedly, I will be able to see the entries.
50 Given I add a new entry to the blog, the entries will be updated.
54 * We can generate a valid feed with just the entries themselves and the existing
56 * We can: Validated by generating an example file.
57 * Including just a list of items with the whole content is good enough for
59 * We can't: It seems like we'll require at least a guid. The old reader
60 behaves correctly with just the guid. It's unclear whether feedly
61 does since it has caching. Will leave grok running.
62 * It isn't required to link back, and we can include the whole text.
63 * This is correct, however it might make sense to just link to the
68 * We won't be parsing the markdown to generate feed items.
69 * We won't be adding any sort of frontmatter to the entries.
70 * The blog will remain ephemeral, and we won't introduce permalinks.
71 * We won't have configurable templating or options to add/remove
76 (Note: This solution is incomplete. We need to add guid and pubDate
77 generation, as this is required for the RSS to be usable)
79 We will split the current generator function into generators, and create
80 a new generator that will generate an RSS 2.0 file
85 ┌─────────────────┐ ┌───────────────┐
87 ┌─────▶│ StaticGenerator │──────────▶│ Static Assets │
89 │ └─────────────────┘ └───────────────┘
90 ┌───────┐ │ ┌───────────────┐ ┌───────────┐
92 │ Blog │──────┼─────▶│ HTMLGenerator │────────────▶│ HTML File │
94 └───────┘ │ └───────────────┘ └───────────┘
95 │ ┌──────────────┐ ┌──────────┐
97 └─────▶│ RSSGenerator │─────────────▶│ RSS File │
99 └──────────────┘ └──────────┘
102 # Theory of Operation
104 When the generate function of the blog is triggered, it will iterate over
105 a list of generator functions and call them with the source and target
106 directories, and an array containing the parsed markdown from the post.
107 Each generator function will do its work, throwing an exception if they
110 When the static generator is called, it will remove the current assets
111 directory in the target directory, and recursively copy the assets from
112 the source directory.
114 When the HTML generator is called, it will parse an `html` template, using
115 the posts as the context, and will place the resulting file in the target
118 When the RSS generator is called, it will parse an `rss` template, using
119 the posts as the context, and will place the resulting file in the target
122 # Technical Specification
124 ## The Generator Interface
126 Every generator must implement this interface in order to work with
129 * Generators MUST be a function
130 * Generators SHOULD read the source, destination, and posts parameters to
132 * Generators MUST NOT write anything into the source directory
133 * Generators MUST return a promise
134 * Generators SHOULD NOT resolve the promise with any information, as it will
136 * Generators MUST throw exceptions if they encounter an unrecoverable error
139 IGenerator(source<String>, destination<String>, posts<Array<String>>) => Promise
146 This generator will have the logic to move static assets around. It will
147 re-use the current asset logic in the `#_generate` method in Blog.
150 StaticGenerator <IGenerator>
155 This generator will have the logic to generate an HTML file. It will
156 re-use the current HTML logic in the `#_generate` method in Blog.
159 HTMLGenerator <IGenerator>
164 This generator will have the logic to generate an RSS file. It will
165 re-use the current HTML logic in the `#_generate` method in Blog,
166 however, instead of using the `index.html` template it will use a
167 `feed.xml` template that generates a valid RSS 2.0 feed document.
170 RSSGenerator <IGenerator>
173 ## Modifications to existing parts of the code
175 The `#_generate` function will be modified so it will now parse the
176 post markdown, and then iterate over the generators, calling them
177 so they create the appropriatet files.
181 Given we're only processing 3 blog posts, and this is a compile time
182 activity and not runtime, there are no recommended metrics in terms
183 of file throughput performance or runtime performance.
185 This should change if this would ever handle a higher volume, or would
186 be expected to run this process runtime.
188 ## Furhter Improvements
190 It's recommended to eventually put more effort in assigning a unique ID
191 to each post so we can use more feed formats.
193 For more compatibility and future proofing, the same solution for
194 RSS could be used to generate other feed formats, just adding
197 This same solution could be extended to serve the blog in different formats
198 (eg. a .txt that is easy to read in terminals)